Directories

Self-Hosting tools directory

A curated directory of infrastructure tools and services for developers looking to maintain full control over their deployment stack, optimize hosting costs, and ensure data sovereignty.

category:
pricing_model:

Showing 10 of 10 entries

Coolify

open-source

An open-source, self-hosted alternative to Heroku and Netlify that manages applications, databases, and services via a web UI.

Pros

  • + Supports Docker, Nixpacks, and static sites
  • + Automated SSL through Let's Encrypt
  • + Built-in backup management for databases

Cons

  • Still in active development with occasional breaking changes
  • Resource intensive for very small VPS instances
paasdockerdeployment
Visit ↗

Traefik

open-source

A modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer designed to deploy microservices with automatic configuration discovery.

Pros

  • + Native Docker integration and auto-discovery
  • + Automatic ACME (Let's Encrypt) certificate resolution
  • + Rich middleware ecosystem for auth and headers

Cons

  • YAML configuration syntax can be verbose
  • Steeper learning curve compared to Caddy
proxynetworkingdocker
Visit ↗

Caddy

open-source

A powerful, enterprise-ready open-source web server with automatic HTTPS written in Go.

Pros

  • + Simplest configuration syntax (Caddyfile)
  • + Automatic HTTPS by default
  • + Extensible via Go plugins

Cons

  • Plugin management requires custom builds
  • Documentation for advanced JSON config is complex
web-serverhttpsproxy
Visit ↗

Uptime Kuma

open-source

A self-hosted monitoring tool that tracks website uptime and service health with a clean dashboard.

Pros

  • + Supports multi-protocol monitoring (HTTP, TCP, Ping, DNS)
  • + Extensive notification integrations (Telegram, Discord, Slack)
  • + Zero-configuration status pages

Cons

  • No long-term metrics storage like Prometheus
  • Single-user focus lacks advanced RBAC
monitoringuptimestatus-page
Visit ↗

Portainer

freemium

A lightweight management UI that allows you to easily manage your different Docker environments.

Pros

  • + Visualizes containers, images, and volumes
  • + Simplifies Docker Compose stack deployment
  • + Templates for common self-hosted apps

Cons

  • Business features locked behind paid tier
  • Can become a single point of failure for container management
dockerguiorchestration
Visit ↗

Hetzner Cloud

paid

European-based cloud provider offering high-performance VPS instances with strict GDPR compliance.

Pros

  • + Exceptional price-to-performance ratio
  • + ISO 27001 certified data centers in Germany and Finland
  • + Clean API and Terraform provider support

Cons

  • Strict account verification process
  • Limited global regions compared to AWS/GCP
vpsgdprhosting
Visit ↗

Restic

open-source

A fast, secure, and efficient backup program that supports multiple storage backends.

Pros

  • + Deduplication saves significant storage space
  • + Native support for S3, SFTP, and local storage
  • + Backups are encrypted by default

Cons

  • CLI-only interface may be difficult for beginners
  • Pruning old backups can be resource-intensive
backupsecuritystorage
Visit ↗

Watchtower

open-source

A process for automating Docker container base image updates.

Pros

  • + Completely automated image polling and restarts
  • + Can notify via multiple channels when updates occur
  • + Supports private registries

Cons

  • Automatic updates can break apps if semver is not followed
  • Requires access to the Docker socket
automationdockerupdates
Visit ↗

Dokku

open-source

A Docker-powered mini-Heroku that helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications.

Pros

  • + Git-push-to-deploy workflow
  • + Extremely low resource overhead
  • + Large plugin ecosystem for databases and SSL

Cons

  • CLI-centric management (no official web UI)
  • Limited to single-node deployments
paasgitdocker
Visit ↗

Tailscale

freemium

A zero-config VPN that creates a secure mesh network between your self-hosted servers and devices.

Pros

  • + Bypasses CGNAT and complex firewall rules
  • + Based on the secure WireGuard protocol
  • + MagicDNS for easy internal service discovery

Cons

  • Control plane is closed source (unless using Headscale)
  • Adds minor latency compared to direct connections
vpnsecuritywireguard
Visit ↗